19 April 2007

The intellectual battle between lovers

Is it really necessary? Okay, sure it is very necessary but, is it really necessary having this battle constantly? The battle should transform into something else but battle, a battle doesn’t give you a chance to relax at any point. Maybe to an intellectual challenge, challenges are okay I think.
The superior I’m always coming back to, someday I’ll regret even using that word, but okay. The superior, damn it, it’s what we need, what I need. But. What makes the superior being the superior is not him/her being aware he/she is a superior but the fact that the superior sees these intellectual battles as intellectual challenges instead.
So, what does that make me? Your superior? No damn it, I’m not aware of it, so maybe. Now please, would you stop being aware of it too, and challenge me instead!

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Huvudet på spiken. Du tog det vidare till utmaning ist. klokt.;)

Anonymous said...

So what, you want a game of one-upmanship?

Emre Kızılkaya said...

"What makes the superior being the superior is not him/her being aware he/she is a superior but the fact that the superior sees these intellectual battles as intellectual challenges instead."

I can add something else:

"What makes the superior being the superior is not him/her being aware he/she is a superior but the fact that the inferior accepts him/her as the superior."

Anonymous said...

...Emre - right!...It takes two for tango..the same meanining...;o))

Lunjo

kathryn merteuil said...

emre
hm,,,there is no inferior in lovers between.

lunjo
tango, jeste.

Emre Kızılkaya said...

Yes, for the real love. However frequently people think that it is love, while it is just a master/slave relationship.

Changing the role occasionally doesn't mean that this M/S relationship evolves.